19 research outputs found
Estimating the global burden of endemic canine rabies
Background: Rabies is a notoriously underreported and neglected disease of lowincome
countries. This study aims to estimate the public health and economic burden
of rabies circulating in domestic dog populations, globally and on a country-by-country
basis, allowing an objective assessment of how much this preventable disease costs
endemic countries.<p></p>
Methodology/Principal Findings: We established relationships between rabies mortality
and rabies prevention and control measures, which we incorporated into a model
framework. We used data derived from extensive literature searches and
questionnaires on disease incidence, control interventions and preventative measures
within this framework to estimate the disease burden. The burden of rabies impacts on
public health sector budgets, local communities and livestock economies, with the
highest risk of rabies in the poorest regions of the world. This study estimates that
globally canine rabies causes approximately 59,000 (95% Confidence Intervals: 25-
159,000) human deaths, over 3.7 million (95% CIs: 1.6-10.4 million) disability-adjusted
life years (DALYs) and 8.6 billion USD (95% CIs: 2.9-21.5 billion) economic losses
annually. The largest component of the economic burden is due to premature death
(55%), followed by direct costs of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP, 20%) and lost
income whilst seeking PEP (15.5%), with only limited costs to the veterinary sector due
to dog vaccination (1.5%), and additional costs to communities from livestock losses
(6%).<p></p>
Conclusions/Significance: This study demonstrates that investment in dog vaccination,
the single most effective way of reducing the disease burden, has been inadequate
and that the availability and affordability of PEP needs improving. Collaborative
investments by medical and veterinary sectors could dramatically reduce the current
large, and unnecessary, burden of rabies on affected communities. Improved
surveillance is needed to reduce uncertainty in burden estimates and to monitor the
impacts of control efforts.<p></p>
Seroprevalence of hepatitis B in pregnant women in Mexico Seroprevalencia de hepatitis B en mujeres embarazadas en MĂ©xico
OBJECTIVE: To determine the seroprevalence of hepatitis B in pregnant women from several regions of Mexico, as well as the risk factors associated with its occurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between May and August 2000. It included 9 992 pregnant women attending the health services of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social-IMSS) in five cities: Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, Acapulco, Cancun, and Mexico City (northeast and southeast regions). RESULTS: The overall prevalence for confirmed cases was 1.65% (165/9 992). The prevalences for individual cities were as follows: Tijuana, 1.27%; Ciudad Juarez, 1.46%; Acapulco, 2.47%; Cancun, 0.93%; northeastern Mexico City, 1.20%, and southeastern Mexico City, 2.52%. The risk factors found to be associated with HBsAg were: age, age at first sexual intercourse, city (Acapulco and southeastern Mexico City), and marital status (single or divorced). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBsAg in pregnant women (1.65%) was greater than that reported in previous studies and showed geographical differences. This high prevalence suggests that a considerable amount of cases of hepatitis B occurs perinatally and through contact with carriers in the general population. Vaccination of newborns of high-risk pregnant women should be considered.OBJETIVO: Determinar la seroprevalencia de hepatitis B en mujeres embarazadas de varias regiones de MĂ©xico e investigar factores de riesgo asociados. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Durante el periodo de mayo-agosto del año 2000 se realizĂł un estudio transversal en 9 992 mujeres embarazadas, con acceso a seguridad social (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) en cinco ciudades de MĂ©xico: Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, Acapulco, CancĂşn y Distrito Federal (zona noreste y sureste). RESULTADOS: La prevalencia global para casos confirmados fue de 1.65% (165/9 992). Para las ciudades de estudio fue: 1.27% en Tijuana, 1.46% en Ciudad Juárez, 2.47% en Acapulco, 0.93% en CancĂşn, 1.2% en el noreste del Distrito Federal, y 2.52% en el sureste del Distrito Federal. Los factores de riesgo identificados fueron: edad, edad de inicio de vida sexual, ciudad (Acapulco y regiĂłn sureste del Distrito Federal) y estado civil (solteras-divorciadas). CONCLUSIONES: La prevalencia de antĂgeno de superficie del virus de la hepatitis B (HBsAg, por sus siglas en inglĂ©s) en embarazadas (1.65%) es mayor a la reportada en investigaciones previas y muestra diferencias geográficas. Esta prevalencia elevada indica un nĂşmero considerable de casos de hepatitis B ocasionados por vĂa perinatal y de portadores en nuestra poblaciĂłn. Se debe considerar la vacunaciĂłn en reciĂ©n nacidos de mujeres embarazadas con alto riesgo
Seroprevalence of hepatitis B in pregnant women in Mexico
Objetivo. Determinar la seroprevalencia de hepatitis B en mujeres embarazadas de varias regiones de MĂ©xico e investigar factores de riesgo asociados. Material y mĂ©todos. Durante el periodo de mayo-agosto del año 2000 se realizĂł un estudio transversal en 9 992 mujeres embarazadas, con acceso a seguridad social (Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social) en cinco ciudades de MĂ©xico: Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, Acapulco, CancĂşn y Distrito Federal (zona noreste y sureste). Resultados. La prevalencia global para casos confirmados fue de 1.65% (165/9 992). Para las ciudades de estudio fue: 1.27% en Tijuana, 1.46% en Ciudad Juárez, 2.47% en Acapulco, 0.93% en CancĂşn, 1.2% en el noreste del Distrito Federal, y 2.52% en el sureste del Distrito Federal. Los factores de riesgo identificados fueron: edad, edad de inicio de vida sexual, ciudad (Acapulco y regiĂłn sureste del Distrito Federal) y estado civil (solteras-divorciadas). Conclusiones. La prevalencia de antĂgeno de superficie del virus de la hepatitis B (HBsAg, por sus siglas en inglĂ©s) en embarazadas (1.65%) es mayor a la reportada en investigaciones previas y muestra diferencias geográficas. Esta prevalencia elevada indica un nĂşmero considerable de casos de hepatitis B ocasionados por vĂa perinatal y de portadores en nuestra poblaciĂłn. Se debe considerar la vacunaciĂłn en reciĂ©n nacidos de mujeres embarazadas con alto riesgo. El texto completo en inglĂ©s de este artĂculo tambiĂ©n está disponible en: http://www.insp.mx/salud/index.htm
Incidence of Category II and III Dog Bites among 5-14 year old children in El Nido estimated from passive and active surveillance, 2011 to 2012
<p><u>Active surveillance</u></p>
<p> At enrollment, a questionnaire
was completed in order to collect the history of potential rabies exposures
(animal bites and scratches) over the past 6 months in the cohort children. Information
about a child’s possible rabies exposures was collected retrospectively through
home visits, mobile phone contact, and through consultations with midwives and
village health workers, teachers and neighbors.
During the 18 months of follow-up beginning July 2011, active detection
of rabies exposures was conducted every three months until December 2012 and
included the interview of the exposed patient’s parent regarding incidents of
contact with a suspected rabid animal. Parents
were contacted and asked whether their child had experienced contact with a
suspect rabid animal since the previous interview and follow-up forms were
completed. All patients that had experienced a potential exposure during the
previous three months were visited at home and standardized rabies exposure
forms (REF) were completed. All follow-up questionnaires administered during
the study were similar except the questionnaire provided in March 2012, in
which questions regarding the PrEP were added. Also in 2012, a small survey was carried out
of the parents of 328 randomly chosen children who were not vaccinated, to determine
the reasons for this.</p>
<p> During the follow-up period, the
ABTC data were collected on all children with a reported contact with a suspect
rabid animal. Every three months thereafter,
an ABTC data retrieval form was completed for every rabies exposure
consultation for a child included in the study cohort. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><u>Passive
surveillance</u></p>
Data on animal bite
consultations of children in the same age group as the study cohort at the ABTC
were collected retrospectively for the period from January 2011 to December
2012 in order to establish a temporal trend of exposures. Bite incidence was
calculated from the number of bites amongst children divided by the total
number of children aged 5-14 years old based on the 2007 Population Census
Incidence of Category II and III Dog Bites among 5-14 year old children in El Nido estimated from passive and active surveillance, 2011 to 2012
<p><u>Active surveillance</u></p>
<p> At enrollment, a questionnaire
was completed in order to collect the history of potential rabies exposures
(animal bites and scratches) over the past 6 months in the cohort children. Information
about a child’s possible rabies exposures was collected retrospectively through
home visits, mobile phone contact, and through consultations with midwives and
village health workers, teachers and neighbors.
During the 18 months of follow-up beginning July 2011, active detection
of rabies exposures was conducted every three months until December 2012 and
included the interview of the exposed patient’s parent regarding incidents of
contact with a suspected rabid animal. Parents
were contacted and asked whether their child had experienced contact with a
suspect rabid animal since the previous interview and follow-up forms were
completed. All patients that had experienced a potential exposure during the
previous three months were visited at home and standardized rabies exposure
forms (REF) were completed. All follow-up questionnaires administered during
the study were similar except the questionnaire provided in March 2012, in
which questions regarding the PrEP were added. Also in 2012, a small survey was carried out
of the parents of 328 randomly chosen children who were not vaccinated, to determine
the reasons for this.</p>
<p> During the follow-up period, the
ABTC data were collected on all children with a reported contact with a suspect
rabid animal. Every three months thereafter,
an ABTC data retrieval form was completed for every rabies exposure
consultation for a child included in the study cohort. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><u>Passive
surveillance</u></p>
Data on animal bite
consultations of children in the same age group as the study cohort at the ABTC
were collected retrospectively for the period from January 2011 to December
2012 in order to establish a temporal trend of exposures. Bite incidence was
calculated from the number of bites amongst children divided by the total
number of children aged 5-14 years old based on the 2007 Population Census
Costs of Rabies Post-Exposure Prophylaxis According to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Status
<p>Costs of PrEP were assessed for the cohort of 4,666 children in the
study at the time of PreP administration. PrEP schedule followed the WHO
guidelines, with intradermal administration of 0.1 ml volume per site (one site
each day) given on days 0, 7 and 28. </p>
<p>The direct medical costs included cost of
biologicals (rabies vaccine), cost per shipment, considered as 2% of the
vaccine cost, cost of needles, alcohol and cotton used. Costs related to health
care staff were not included. The number of
doses per vial assumed for the analysis is 4, although in theory 1 vial could
be used to deliver 5 x 0.1 mL doses, thus 20% vaccine wastage is built into the
calculations.</p><p>In addition, to explore further the benefits
of such vaccination program, projected costs of two hypothetical cohorts of
children bitten by a dog were assessed according to two scenarios: </p><p>(i) Scenario
1, no PrEP: </p><p>
Assessment of the costs related to the expected annual number of
children among the study cohort bitten by a dog, assuming they did not have
PrEP. These children were considered to follow the standard of care for
Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) defined as 2-site intradermal method (2-2-2-0-1)
for use with PVRV (complete PEP), with RIG given for category III bites.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>(ii) Scenario
2, with PrEP</p><p>
Assessment of the costs related to the expected annual number of
children among the study cohort bitten by a dog benefiting from PrEP. Following
the national guidelines, such patients should be given only two booster doses
on days 0 and 3, but no RIG. </p><p>
Costs associated with
wound care (e.g. antibiotics, tetanus immunization) were not included in the
analysis since these do not depend on rabies vaccination status of the patient.
Indirect costs were also not included in the analysis.</p><p>
Time horizon for the comparison of the economic benefit of the two
strategies was projected to 1 year, 5 years and 10 years. All medical costs
were expressed in terms of Philippine peso (PhP), and converted to US dollars
(USD) using the average exchange rate of USD 1 = PhP 43. <br></p
Percentages of Students who knew about Rabies based on pre and post-tests of students in El Nido Elementary Schools, School Year 2012-13
The rabies education manual was used during
the 2012 to 13 school year. It contains modules on rabies which teachers could
integrate into Science and Health, Makabayan (Civics, Social Studies,
Geography, and History), Filipino, English and Mathematics subjects for the
different grade levels throughout the year. An assessment of the impact of the education
program was conducted among students in 12 randomly selected elementary schools
in the municipality. Pre- and post-intervention
tests were conducted among a sample of the students to assess the impact of the
education materials, testing the students’ knowledge of rabies, its
transmission, dog bite prevention, dog bite management, and responsible pet
ownership. The pre-tests were conducted
in July 2012 while the post-tests were conducted in March 2013